On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 10:38 AM, John Vandenberg <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Federico Leva (Nemo) > <[email protected]> wrote: >> This re-licensing seems even more legally complex than ours (although >> uncontroversial). > > How can they relicense without explicit permission from each > contributor, or an update clause in the licence?
I should rtfm. "The current copyright notice states that the copyright belongs to Canonical. " -- John Vandenberg _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
