Spreading free knowledge implies a good free knowledge infrastructure, including reputable free knowledge tools. We don't need the US govt to use any given software, it pays to make it as widely usable and not block ourselves from any major group who might want to try using Mediawiki.
Not least 1/ the US govt is not the only such body (other groups receiving federal funds?) and 2/ we ourselves have a genuine interest in ensuring we think hard how those with disabilities experience Wikimedia in everyday use, when creating our platform. FT2 On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 7:51 AM, Ting Chen <[email protected]> wrote: > Since we are not funded by the government and we have no relation what > so ever with the US government I don't see what VPAT has any relevance > to us. If the US government think MediaWiki doesn't fulfill the > condition, they had to use another wiki engine I am afraid. > > Greetings > Ting > _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
