Le 11/03/2011 00:57, Mani Pande a écrit : > > >> MzMcBride wrote: > >> "After having looked at the survey content, the survey software, and the >> survey format (particularly the length), I have very, very low confidence >> that anything of value will come from this (beyond lessons of what not to do >> next time)." >> > Based upon my experience having conducted surveys and quantitative > research for over 12 years, this is a very incorrect assessment of the > survey. The survey answers questions that are important to the > foundation, and will help us understand the editor community so we can > provide them an engaging editing environment, ensure we can increase > their needs to increase retention and increase the diversity among > editors. As for Lime Survey, it is a great open source tool that is able > to meet all our needs. Again based upon my experience, a 20 minute > survey is standard for most surveys. A learning from our last survey was > that our community is very engaged and I believe the length of the > survey is the least of our problems.
"Increase their needs"? Could you elaborate? _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
