Am 13.03.2011 13:01, schrieb Peter Carney: > Validly licenced images of this building and thousands of others are > routinely deleted due to Wikimedia Commons' 'FoP' policy. Clearly this > damages our educational mission and impacts many projects. One > proposed remedy is a tweak to the policy on the lines of that arising > from the National Portrait Gallery dispute. Opponents of change say > things like "Commons only accepts free content" which was never > strictly true even before the NPG/PD-art policy change. > > The question which I'd like to hear your views on is: Can you think of > any valid arguments to the effect that deleting these images has an > upside - a benefit to our mission? > > P Carney
The upside is, that we won't get sued by copyright holders, I guess. Marcus Buck User:Slomox _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l