That was sortof the point behind proposed changes - some articles deserve more scrutiny applied to edits.
However politics pretty much killed the idea on en. On Mar 14, 2011 6:33 AM, "John Vandenberg" <[email protected]> wrote: >> Thoughts? > > The intention of this proposal, and this thread, is _not_ to improve > our processes/handling of BLPs, however that is one of the likely > outcomes of splitting BLPs to a separate project. > > The intention of this proposal is to split English Wikipedia into more > than one project, so different editing policies/guidelines and > administration practices can form. > > I proposed BLPs as a candidate for a new project because they are the > simplest set of pages to define and it is accepted that the current > structure results in new BLP violations every minute, and many of > these are not addressed for months. The main wikipedia project would > still need strong policies to ensure BLP violations can be dealt with > in articles that are not biographies. > > -- > John Vandenberg > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > [email protected] > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
