And even if that was true for the English Wikipedia, it certainly is not for other large Wikipedias, which seem to have the same trend, according to the study.
2011/3/29 Nikola Smolenski <[email protected]> > On 03/29/2011 11:40 AM, Theo10011 wrote: > > The second issue as I see it, we might not be approaching the sum of all > > human knowledge but we're running out of what the core > non/semi-professional > > community can contribute. We are at over 3.5 million articles (go > Pokemon) > > I strongly disagree. I see thousands of articles I could write outside > of my profession if only I would have time and inclination. And I see > missing articles even in well-covered topics like programming. > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > [email protected] > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
