Can you also provide at least a rough estimate of the number of humans who don't have Wikipedia in any language they speak reasonably well (understanding very well that this is a hard problem of definition)?
Curious. On May 22, 2011, at 14:15, Milos Rancic wrote: > I am preparing document for Wikimania. Presently, I am in process of > analyzing data (SIL [1], Ethnologue [2], Wikimedia projects). I am using > Ethnologue data for population estimates. > > Before I started this task, I thought that the situation is not so bad > (or good, if it is about possibility for development). I thought that we > are around the end of languages with more than 1M of speakers. However, > this is far from being true. > > There are no Wikipedias in 243 languages with more than 1M of speakers. > Of those, 27 have more than 10M of speakers. > > The biggest language without any Wikimedia project is Jin Chinese, with > 45 millions of speakers. > > Around 1 billion of people belong to the group of big languages without > Wikipedia (or any Wikimedia project) in their language. > > Of those, 480 millions have test projects, but 550 millions don't have > even test project; including: > > * Jin Chinese, 45M, China > * Haryanvi, 38M, India, incubator > * Xiang Chinese, 36, China, incubator > * Maithili, 34M, India, incubator > * Nigerian Pidgin, 30M, Nigeria, incubator > * Filipino, 25M, Philippines, incubator > * Chhattisgarhi, 17.5M, India, incubator > * Rangpuri, 15M, Bangladesh > * Seraiki, 13.8M, Pakistan, incubator > * Madura, 13.6M, Indonesia, incubator > * Haryanvi, 13M, India > * Deccan, 12.8M, India > * Malvi, 10.4M, India > * Min Bei Chinese, 10.3M, China, incubator > * Sylheti, 10.3M, Bangladesh > > Around 300 millions of people are using languages with less than 1M of > speakers which don't have Wikipedia editions. > > Note that for all languages in the world Ethnologue gives the number of > 6.15 billion, which is pretty accurate, counting that current estimate > (according to Wikipedia [3]) is 6.92 billion and that counting speakers > is very different from counting official population statistics. > > Those are preliminary results. We have two chapters (and strategic > focus) in countries of the list above. Inside of the longer list, which > should be verified, we have more chapters. I noted that there are even > two languages of Germany without Wikipedia, but with more than million > of speakers: Mainfränkisch and Upper Saxon (the later one without test > Wikipedia). > > The list of countries with languages with more than 1M of speakers and > without Wikipedia is: Afghanistan, Algeria, Angola, Bangladesh, Benin, > Bolivia, Brazil, Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Chad, China, Congo, Côte > d’Ivoire, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Ecuador, Egypt, Equatorial > Guinea, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Germany, Ghana, Guatemala, Guinea, India, > Indonesia (Java and Bali), Indonesia (Kalimantan), Indonesia (Nusa > Tenggara), Indonesia (Sulawesi), Indonesia (Sumatra), Iran, Iraq, > Jamaica, Jordan, Kenya, Libya, Madagascar, Malawi, Malaysia > (Peninsular), Mali, Mauritania, Morocco, Mozambique, Myanmar, Namibia, > Niger, Nigeria, Pakistan, Paraguay, Peru, Philippines, Saudi Arabia, > Senegal, Serbia, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Africa, Sudan, Syria, > Tanzania, Thailand, Tunisia, Turkey (Asia), Uganda, Viet Nam, Yemen, > Zambia, Zimbabwe. > > [1] http://www.sil.org/ > [2] http://www.ethnologue.com/ > [3] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_population > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > [email protected] > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
