Thank you for your answer. I discovered that Wikipedia was not a bureaucracy[1] in the link you gave, that's encouraging. :)
[1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:NOT#Wikipedia_is_not_a_bureaucracy Le 22/05/2011 12:23, Thomas Morton a écrit : > Yes. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:FREESPEECH > > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:FREESPEECH>Obviously you have your > normal legal rights (i.e. if someone does something illegal, then it is a > courts matter). But the idea that "I have a right to edit Wikipedia" or "You > have no right to do that" is incorrect, because WP is a private website. > > If the consensus of the community is to ban you from the project, even under > spurious grounds, there is nothing to stop them from doing so. > > Tom > > On 22 May 2011 16:19, Pronoein <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Le 22/05/2011 10:54, Thomas Morton a écrit : >>> we have no >>> "rights" to participate in Wikipedia. >> Regardless of the debate from where it comes, is this an accurate >> decription of the rules and policies of Wikipedia? >> >> _______________________________________________ >> foundation-l mailing list >> [email protected] >> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l >> > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > [email protected] > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
