On 06/01/2011 11:56 PM, phoebe ayers wrote: > We meant what is stated there: that Wikimedia project content should > be at a minimum both free and educational in nature. (In general, you > can assume that language in resolutions like this is intentional). > However, you can also safely assume that the Board did not > specifically discuss the scope of Wikinews when writing this > resolution; we were focused on the topic at hand. I personally think > there is a very valid argument to be made that Wikinews, like most > news sources and like the rest of our projects, is educational (as > well as possessing other qualities, such as the more general quality > of being informative, which also arguably applies to all of our > projects).
Thanks for clarification. According to the last sentence, I would say that everything is fine for now, at least. _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
