On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 8:50 AM, Dan Rosenthal <[email protected]> wrote: > I see, I was reading the statement to imply that he/she was somehow using > Wikimedia projects as a method of acquiring personally identifiable > information, not as a distribution method.
Cato (=Poetlister) was a checkuser, so they did also have access to personally identifiable information. Only the WMF can know whether the identity provided was fraudulent or not, and if they destroyed all records like they say they do, even they cant know. -- John Vandenberg _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
