On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 1:33 PM, phoebe ayers <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm glad to see this discussion made more general -- beyond this > particular case, and towards the general process for how and when we > can (and should) globally ban someone. I also think that we need to > have a clear process that can be used -- with care, but also without > requiring debate about *process* for every case. It helps everyone if > there are agreed-upon minimum standards for behavior and a process for > review of problems. More specifically, I think Scott's suggestions > above make a lot of sense. > Jumping off of this conversation, and trying to push the conversation to on-wiki ;-), I've created a page on Meta with a set of open questions... https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/meta/wiki/Global_bans Please edit boldly! I also wanted to say that I think the views expressed by Yaroslav and Strainu earlier about participation from people who aren't English Wikipedians need to be on the top of our priority list for discussions like these. Steven _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
