I wouldn't describe a short article as "hardly useful for creation" I created http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mountain_Pass,_California only three years and already the current article is five times the size of what I created. It still has some of my original content, and some has been spunoff into an even bigger new article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mountain_Pass_rare_earth_mine
Who knows how much those small articles will grow in future years and decades. WereSpielChequers > > Indeed, 7 out of 19 articles I created over three weeks are in Great > Soviet Encyclopaedia (and about a dozen of more among those I expanded as > well). One of these (on a folklorist Anna Astakhova, which I started today) > does not exist in Russian Wikipedia. Admittedly all of them (in GSE, not > those I created) are very short and hardly useful for creation a Wikipedia > article - although GSE gives a clear proof of notability, just in case. > > Cheers > Yaroslav > > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > > > End of foundation-l Digest, Vol 87, Issue 35 > ******************************************** > _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
