I guess that Amir was rather referring to the cultural aspect than the legal aspect. Even if you are legally allowed to change something, that doesnt mean the original author likes it. I assume that all Wiki projects have this culture in them, that nobody "owns" an article - this doesn't mean however that there are no exceptions (people who think they are exceptions or policies allowing temporary exceptions to be able to make a nice draft - for example in ones own usernamespace).
Amir, is there a specific background that you are thinking of which is why you are asking this? Maybe that helps people answering your question. Best, Lodewijk 2011/6/17 Strainu <[email protected]> > 2011/6/17 Strainu <[email protected]>: > > Think about a CC-BY-NC-ND wiki. Theoretically, one > > could only add content to that wiki, not edit what has already been > > written. > > Actually, I'm not even sure you could add content to articles on a > CC-BY-NC-ND wiki. Would have to check with a lawyer... > > Strainu > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > [email protected] > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
