> > *Sj and Ting informed us that Board has agreed with the policy after the > discussion. > *
If i understand right that was in Berlin. So the Board had 2 months to put that in a resolution, and didn't. That doesn't sound as a approval to me. _____ *Béria Lima* <http://wikimedia.pt/>(351) 925 171 484 *Imagine um mundo onde é dada a qualquer pessoa a possibilidade de ter livre acesso ao somatório de todo o conhecimento humano. É isso o que estamos a fazer <http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Nossos_projetos>.* 2011/6/25 Milos Rancic <mill...@gmail.com> > On 06/25/2011 12:38 PM, Lodewijk wrote: > > As you may remember, the report was very long, and even though I speeded > > through it, I did not notice it since I wouldn't ever expect it there :) > The > > fact you published it before doesnt make arguments less valid though. > > I think that the argument is valid as I didn't bother the list with not > important issues from the meeting. > > > I do agree we need some procedure, I am just not sure this is the right > > one. > > > > Just to be super clear: the board approved this procedure explicitely in > a > > vote? (I can't find the resolution yet on foundationwiki) > > Sj and Ting informed us that Board has agreed with the policy after the > discussion. > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l