Well, I just think any repository that lets some non-free works slip through the cracks by accident, can't suddenly be disqualified unless we're ready to disqualify Wikipedia too. So what category do we fit into that they do not?
2011/7/8 David Gerard <[email protected]> > On 8 July 2011 09:20, M. Williamson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Yes, and I'm sure Wikipedia also has lots of copyrighted and dubious > > content, as hard as we try... > > > We're reaching the stage of arguing category membership. This suggests > stepping back: > > John, what do you anticipate as the useful purpose for the answer to > the original question of "largest free content site"? > > (There may be no non-fuzzy answer.) > > > - d. > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > [email protected] > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
