On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 02:28, Robin McCain <[email protected]> wrote: > I'd say that if you've blocked someone who is a sockpuppet or other > abuser the burden of validating such a person should be on them, not the > wiki staff. At least a notary (or other public official) would have to > look at an identity document - verify its validity as well as see that > it indeed matches the person in question - then sign a document to that > effect. This completely removes the wiki staff from the need to access > the validity of a copy.
I guess it is nice to offer the blocked people this alternative, privacy-enhanced method along the old one. I'm sure current poster would be pleased, and I guess the dutch wikigods could accept that solution, too. -- byte-byte, grin _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
