On 15 July 2011 01:03, Alec Conroy <[email protected]> wrote: > Agreed. They're a very very special tool, but software not a > reasonable definition for a movement. The Unnamed Movement should be > software-neutral, if not in name then CERTAINLY in practice.
It's a thing and it exists and it's a concept that needs a name. I tend to call it "the free culture" in my head (which has the annoyance that "free" is ambiguous in English). e.g. discussing how particular people think, "X is a free culture native. Y isn't, but is slowly getting the idea." (The only reason this needs a separate name is Creative Commons pushing and continuing to push -NC and -ND. I and we continue to love CC, but what they do is *not quite* what we do.) - d. _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
