On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 16:43, Milos Rancic <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 15:15, Nathan <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 1:27 AM, Milos Rancic <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I was really surprised this morning by the fact that during the recent >>> days internal-l has beaten foundation-l by activity; which means that >>> I didn't have enough time to read everything. >>> >>> Because of that, I would appreciate (as many others, I suppose) a >>> little digest about the present conflict. >> >> Maybe they could summarize the discussion among the patricii for the >> rest of us mere plebs? > > Hm. I don't understand it, although I am on internal-l. Problems > mentioned here and on internal-l are so general, that I could say that > they exist for a couple of years; and that, although problems still > exist, things are going better, actually. > > So, I am a bit puzzled with the cryptic discussion at internal-l. It > looks like something really bad happened recently, while I am not able > to understand what it was. I mean, what is so bad now which wasn't > that bad or worse a year or so ago?
Oh, the main trigger has been already discussed at foundaiton-l [1]. Something similar on internal-l, as well. [1] http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2011-August/067163.html _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
