On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 3:08 AM, Philippe Beaudette <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> >> So why announce ridiculously unrealistic timeframe between the vote >> concluding and the results being announced? >> >> > First, I disagree that it's "ridiculously unrealistic". Vote checking has > already started and will continue throughout the polling. Second, hindsight > is 20/20. I'll tell you that it's a balancing act... we've gotten it right > a few times and we've gotten it wrong a few times. It's been years since > this type of all-projects election was held for anything but a Board of > Trustees election, and so, yeah, mistakes will be made. But let's just wait > and see on the timeframe, shall we? No doubt an extension will have to > happen, but.... what's the harm? If we take a couple extra days to announce > the results, who has been harmed? > >'
Months, not extra days, dude. -- -- Jussi-Ville Heiskanen, ~ [[User:Cimon Avaro]] _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
