On 26 August 2011 13:30, Andrew Gray <[email protected]> wrote:
> Legal identity is a bit tangential here, I think; if we accept a > pseudonymous account as good enough to release the content under CC > licenses to begin with, then all you'd need for relicensing would be > for those same accounts to agree to it. Yes. What's the threat model here? That a reuser could be sued by an insane or malicious copyright holder. If the same entity that created the text releases the text, that would likely (modulo weirdness in court) be enough. - d. _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
