On 30 August 2011 19:35, John Vandenberg <jay...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 1:42 AM, Risker <risker...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>.. > > Thanks, Bence. Given that the document that is creating so much fuss is > > *not* publicly available, and there are many references to "current" > > agreements without links to the version that particular chapter signed or > > authorized, I'd say it's still pretty hard for those who aren't actively > > involved in the administration of chapters to really know what is going > on. > > The chapters agreement itself doesn't contain several of the points that > are > > so controversial in this thread, for example. > > It is also pretty hard for people actively involved in the > administration of chapters to know what is going on, and why. > > <snip>
Thanks for that comment, John. While I probably don't entirely share your own view (or that of many others) about the entire chapter/fundraising issue, I can certainly understand and sympathise with all of the people from chapters who are trying to figure out their next steps here. It must feel a little like walking on quicksand. Risker/Anne _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
