On 31 August 2011 22:20, Nathan <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Thomas Dalton > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> On 31 August 2011 17:02, Ilario Valdelli <[email protected]> wrote: >> > I mean that was not "negotiable" the choice to have grant >> > agreement/fundraising agreement. >> > >> > Grant agreement have been considered mandatory without any further >> discussion. >> >> Ah, I misunderstood. Sorry. I believe Sue has stated in no uncertain >> terms that the WMF is not going to enter into any more fundraising >> agreements for the upcoming fundraiser, so your experience is >> consistent with that. >> >> You are from WMIT, yes? The tracking chart says there have been legal >> issues with transfering half your revenue from the last fundraiser to >> the WMF. Until those are resolved, there is no way the WMF could enter >> into another fundraising agreement with you. >> > > More stuff discussed on Internal-l only, I suppose.
I don't understand. I can't remember which list Sue's statement was made on, but it's no secret. The tracking chart I referred to is on meta: http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Tracking_Progress_for_2011_chapters_fundraiser_and_reporting There has been plenty of discussion on this subject on internal-l, but nothing of significance is being kept from the wider community. _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
