On 3 September 2011 11:03, David Gerard <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 3 September 2011 10:51, Ray Saintonge <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>  The organization itself is not the objective.
>
>
> +1
>
> What things could WMF do to make itself obsolete as quickly as
> possible, in as many individual areas as possible?

All sorts of things, but would that be desirable? While the
organisation obviously isn't the objective, that doesn't mean that the
objective is not to have the organisation. The organisation (or some
similar organisation) probably is the best way to achieve the
objective.

_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
[email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

Reply via email to