Blame the wording of the survey for not be clear enough? _____ *Béria Lima*
*Imagine um mundo onde é dada a qualquer pessoa a possibilidade de ter livre acesso ao somatório de todo o conhecimento humano. É isso o que estamos a fazer <http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Nossos_projetos>.* On 4 September 2011 11:35, Mikael <[email protected]> wrote: > On the other hand: "I think it is important not to..." isn't necessarily > interpreted the same as "I think it is not important to...". > Which of those answers was meant by the respondents that chose "0"? > > \Mike > > On 04/09 2011 11:17, David Gerard wrote: > > On 4 September 2011 05:33, Philippe Beaudette<[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> The committee running the vote on the features for the Personal Image > Filter > >> have released their interim report and vote count. You may see the > results > >> at http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image_filter_referendum/Results/en. > > > > > > The bimodal distribution in the first graph suggests this feature will > > continue to be controversial (to say the least), with fans saying "we > > had the majority" and foes saying "there is clearly not a consensus". > > > > So. What happens now? > > > > > > - d. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > foundation-l mailing list > > [email protected] > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > [email protected] > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
