On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 5:23 PM, David Gerard <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 4 September 2011 22:18, Sarah Stierch <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> I really wish people would read previous discussions.
>
> > Don't be passive aggressive ;)
>
>
> I think it's an entirely reasonable statement, given what Kim's cited
> in his reply is stuff that came up in the last week.
>
>
>

I travel a lot, I work a lot, and sometimes other things take priority over
read really long Foundation-L threads. I apologize if I didn't make the time
and burdened Kim in anyway.

And again, thanks Kim for repeating everything you've already said in the
past and lazy people like me really appreciate it and I'd give you a
barnstar for repetition if they made one. =)

in #wikilove (and frustration sometimes!),

-Sarah


-- 
GLAMWIKI Partnership Ambassador for the Wikimedia
Foundation<http://www.glamwiki.org>
Wikipedian-in-Residence, Archives of American
Art<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:SarahStierch>
and
Sarah Stierch Consulting
*Historical, cultural & artistic research & advising.*
------------------------------------------------------
http://www.sarahstierch.com/
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
[email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

Reply via email to