> > The *first* instance to be asked about such thing are editors, not > readers. I mean, the first question is "Do *we* want it?". Readers > opinion could be one of the arguments in discussion; likely one of the > most important ones; but decision should be on editors. And Board > should act in opposition to editors just if there is serious threat > for the project existence. However, nobody gave any reason in favor of > avoiding editors' will in favor of Board's decision. Nothing rational, > just personal wishes of a couple of people. And, again, if those > wishes could pass without a lot of drama, I would be fine with it. > However, that's not the case.
As always; I disagree with this view in the strongest possible way :) Readers should always be our primary focus, and their needs should drive everything we do - from editing/writing through to policy and technical changes. They are our life blood and our reason for existing. Just saying :) Tom _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
