On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 15:54, Sarah Stierch <[email protected]> wrote: >> Logically, we have the solution: If Board really cares what Concerned >> Women for America think, let it, please, implement that filter on >> English Wikipedia and leave the rest of the projects alone -- if they >> don't ask for the filter explicitly. As members of that organization >> probably don't know any other language except English, everybody will >> be happy. Except the core editors of English Wikipedia, of course. But >> Board doesn't care about them, anyway; which means that English >> Wikipedia is reasonable scapegoat for Wikimedia movement to please >> sexually impaired Americans and others. >> >> > I think this moves beyond just one organization. As a "concerned feminist" > who "lives in America" the idea of calling the women who support the > referendum, aren't into bad porn on Commons, and tacky use of sexualized > images on articles as "educational" when they really aren't, "sexually > impaired" - is beyond sexist. Unless, perhaps, I'm mis-understanding your > post.
Thanks to Fred, I've realized that it seems that you misread my email. My sarcastic example related to particular organization, not to "concerned women/feminists from America". The organization is called "Concerned Women for America" [1]. They started the whole drama in 2008 [2]. [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concerned_Women_for_America [2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virgin_Killer#Internet_censorship _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
