On 04/09/2011 20:11, church.of.emacs.ml wrote: > On 09/04/2011 07:43 PM, Kim Bruning wrote: >> Assuming that the .de community is similar to the wikimedia community at >> large […] > > That is where I disagree. The personal image filter doesn't make much > sense in German Wikipedia, since the German culture is generally pretty > liberal with respect to depictions of sexuality, (partially) violence > and of course Muhammed. So it's clear that there is simply no or a very > small necessity for a filter; thus the rejection.
I call bullshit. If wikipedia or its chapters should ever be found to be liable under German law there is going to have some explaining to do: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pornography_by_region#Germany http://blogoscoped.com/archive/2007-09-12-n23.html http://www.chillingeffects.org/international/notice.cgi?NoticeID=5990 http://www.chillingeffects.org/international/notice.cgi?NoticeID=2187 _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
