I'd rather have harassment dealt with first by each community's AN/I boards and ArbCom if necessary, and then the Global Requests Committee or whatever it ends up being called. I don't think neither stewards nor the WMF are in the proper position to make arbitrary calls over user conduct. Stewards are meant to be for black and white cases. Personally, I support the introduction of a global ban policy allowing both for Committee and community bans.
~K On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 6:07 AM, Milos Rancic <[email protected]> wrote: > With or without that ToS, any sane ArbCom would block persons who > harass others. But, we don't have a body which is able to do that > globally. The first step is to get that body, then to make some things > explicit. _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
