Tomasz, Some chapters use "Wikimedia" as official name, and some don't. Wikimedia UK for example has "*Wiki UK Ltd*" as official name. There are no real problem with that, since the chapter use the "Wikimedia <country/city/state>" as working name. _____ *Béria Lima*
*Imagine um mundo onde é dada a qualquer pessoa a possibilidade de ter livre acesso ao somatório de todo o conhecimento humano. É isso o que estamos a fazer <http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Nossos_projetos>.* 2011/9/13 Tomasz W. Kozłowski <[email protected]> > Errrm.. this is an official approval of the organisation called "Wiki > Society of Washington, DC Inc." or I miss something? > > From a *very* formal point of view, the Board has just recognised a > non-existing organisation, as there is no single mention of the name > "Wikimedia" in the bylaws of "Wiki Society of Washington, DC Inc.". > Why does Wiki Society of Washington, DC Inc use the name "Wikimedia > District of Columbia" as their official/convenient name, then? > > Am I the first one to spot such a difference in the name of the > chapter? All (or almost all) existing chapters use the name > "Wikimedia" -- WMNYC's official name, for example, is "Wikimedia New > York City". > > -- > Tomasz W. Kozłowski > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > [email protected] > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
