Am 16.09.2011 19:54, schrieb Fae: >> That's a terrible thing to think of them. Of course, it would be >> immediately alleviated by publishing the data. > Hang on, I thought that http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Values > (which underpin the Mission) means that WMF is obliged by their own > published bylaws to openly publish the data in question? > > Cheers, > Fae It's an secret poll, and as far only the summary of the questions (?-10) and a snapshot from the comments (not the comments itself) was released. Overall very unsufficient data. Thats why i requested the results by project and the overall distribution of participation. It is a database-querry that takes seconds/minutes (if your bad some hours) and still could ensure anonymity, as i explained at Phillipes discussion at Meta. [1] I made the same request at the discussion page of the "referendum" more then two weaks ago, to which Phillipe replied.[2]
So after more then two weeks we still do not see any further results. Something that could make your nervous and very angry, if you consider the current situation. [1] http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Philippe [2] http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Image_filter_referendum/Results/en#Results_by_project.3F _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
