Am 23.09.2011 10:27, schrieb Fae: > How odd, checking Tobias' list, I tried > http://www.safesearchkids.com/wikipedia-for-kids.html to look for > "penis" and it recommended [[File:Male erect penis.jpg]] as the second > match. I was expecting it to restrict me to the more rounded and > educational encyclopaedia entries, not straight to the most > challenging images without context. > > If the WMF were to "recommend" such a solution for schools or > religious groups, we might run into some immediate complaints. > > Cheers, > Fae I did not say that the Google filter is perfect. Additionally it could have been that Google does not see that image as offensive or did never revise it. I was talking about the ease that such tools can be built and that there is actually a market for such tools.
If we implement a filter with categories, then we would provide the same data source as Google does. But we should keep in mind: The better/stricter we are, the better/stricter will be filters from third parties. We would invest to provide them the tools and data they need. _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
