Andreas Kolbe, 06/10/2011 02:11: > Well, that *is* nuts. Moreover, the 48-hour time period and potential €12,000 > fine in the > proposed law are nuts (pity the blogger who has gone on a 2-week holiday). > Yet that > €12,000 fine is not mentioned in the it:WP statement. Being forced to include > a statement > in an article is less of an issue to me than the prospect of being fined > €12,000 if it isn't done > in time. *That* is where the chilling effect comes from, yet the it:WP > statement doesn't > mention it.
Yes, in fact I don't understand why this wasn't included in the statement, I asked on the talk but it was too late. I guess it was already long enough and the authors preferred to keep it about principles. Nemo _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
