On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Thomas Morton < [email protected]> wrote: > > You've confused "a fact" with factual.
I've confused the adjective form with the noun form of "fact"? I'm quite sure that I have. *The judge convicted Abby of killing Betty, saying that the overwhelming > evidence indicated manslaughter.* > > The latter is factual, and contains facts & opinions. > It contains facts about opinions - it does not itself express an opinion. It is both factual, and a fact. But this is really irrelevant to the problem at hand Definitely! > - because we are not > talking about presenting a factually different piece of prose to suit an > individuals preference Although that is true, it doesn't make any difference. There is information content in an image - if there wasn't, we wouldn't need any. Making a decision to use or not to use an image is an editorial decision, and in some cases it could enhance or detract from the neutrality of the article. > Removal of, say, a nude image on the Vagina article does not bias or > detract > from the information. Then we can solve the problem by removing the image completely, since the article would be completely unaffected by it. Cheers, Andrew (Thparkth) _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
