Grazie! :) 2011/10/13 Federico Leva (Nemo) <[email protected]>: > Nickanc Wikipedia, 12/10/2011 14:21: >> Yes, there are these groups, but in most wikipedias they have few >> persons inside it and they have almost no policy; > > That's because few people need it. > In it wiki basta una riga in [[WP:RA]], secondo me. > >> moreover if you look >> for global ipblock exempt you may found that they are still vulnerable >> to IP and IP range blocks made locally on individual wikis >> (http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Global_blocks_and_bans#Global_IP_block_exemption >> ). so, for example, how could a chinese write on it.wiki? or, if >> Berlusconi's law will get approved, how could italians write freely on >> all wikis, if in fact there is no global ipblock exempt? > > Only very few users seriously edit on multiple wikis and for interwikis > or such very minor edits they could use a sockpuppet, in your > hypothetical example. The global-ipblock-exempt includes global > torunblocked permission, anyway. > > Nemo > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > [email protected] > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l >
_______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
