From: Tobias Oelgarte <[email protected]>
>
>Am 18.10.2011 11:43, schrieb Thomas Morton:
>> It is this fallacious logic that underpins our crazy politics of
>> "neutrality" which we attempt to enforce on people (when in practice we lack
>> neutrality almost as much as the next man!).
>... and that is exactly what makes me curious about this approach. You 
>assume that we aren't neutral and Sue described us in median a little 
>bit geeky, which goes in the same direction. But if we aren't neutral at 
>all, how can we even believe that an controversial-content-filter-system 
>based upon our views would be neutral in judgment or as proposed in the 
>referendum "cultural neutral". (Question: Is there even a thing as 
>cultural neutrality?)

Who said that the personal image filter function should be based on *our* 
judgment? It shouldn't. 

As Wikipedians, we are used to working from sources. In deciding what content 
to include, we look at high-quality, educational sources, and try to reflect 
them fairly. 

Now, given that we are a top-10 website, why should it not make sense to look 
at what other large websites like Google, Bing, and Yahoo allow the user to 
filter, and what media Flickr and YouTube require opt-ins for? Why should we 
not take our cues from them? The situation seems quite analogous.

As the only major website *not* to offer users a filter, we have more in common 
with 4chan than the mainstream. Any abstract discussion of neutrality that 
neglects to address this fundamental point misses the mark. Our present 
approach is not neutral by our own definition of neutrality; it owes more to 
Internet culture than to the sources we cite.

Another important point that Thomas made is that any filter set-up should use 
objective criteria, rather than criteria based on offensiveness. We should not 
make a value judgment, we should simply offer users the browsing choices they 
are used to in mainstream sites.  

Best,
Andreas
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
[email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

Reply via email to