> ------------------------------ > > Message: 9 > Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 14:16:47 +0100 > From: David Gerard <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Is random article truly random > To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List > <[email protected]> > Message-ID: > <caj0tu1h2kggb0wwkhomoow3yvnvkkbpqms+fq+v82r6e_jl...@mail.gmail.com > > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > On 19 October 2011 14:14, Andrew Garrett <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Well, let's make sure that in any implementation of an image filter > > that does go ahead, we've thought through and addressed each of those > > consequences. You won't find any argument from me on that. > > -- > > Andrew Garrett > > Wikimedia Foundation > > [email protected] > > > So from the Foundation side, what are the current plans? I assume this > is a subject of internal discussion. > > > - d. > > > > I don't know what's being said in the Foundation or on the internal mailing list. But we have a time out for three months before the developers will be available, and Sue Gardner has accepted that solutions can't be based on our category system. http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:WereSpielChequers/filter#Thanks_for_this_proposal.2C_WereSpielCheqrs
WereSpielChequers _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
