Achal, I don't quite understand what is the idea, meaning or whatever you wrote in your mail.
Can you explain (this time with full and meaningful sentences), please? _____ *Béria Lima* <http://wikimedia.pt/>(351) 925 171 484 *Imagine um mundo onde é dada a qualquer pessoa a possibilidade de ter livre acesso ao somatório de todo o conhecimento humano. Ajude-nos a construir esse sonho. <http://wikimedia.pt/Donativos>* On 15 November 2011 14:19, Achal Prabhala <aprabh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Can we not pick on a person whose "POV" is that he wishes to participate > in the Wikimedia movement in the fullest way possible? > > Pick on me instead. Oh wait... > > Best wishes, > Achal > > On Tuesday 15 November 2011 07:40 PM, Béria Lima wrote: > > OMG Gomà, can´t you leave any thread in peace without push your POV? > > _____ > > *Béria Lima* > > <http://wikimedia.pt/>(351) 925 171 484 > > > > *Imagine um mundo onde é dada a qualquer pessoa a possibilidade de ter > > livre acesso ao somatório de todo o conhecimento humano. Ajude-nos a > > construir esse sonho.<http://wikimedia.pt/Donativos>* > > > > > > On 15 November 2011 09:37, Joan Goma<jrg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >>> Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 19:12:42 +0000 > >>> From: B?ria Lima<berial...@gmail.com> > >>> Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Fwd: Wikimedia India Program Trust > >>> > >>> *The way I see is India is a land of immense potential for the > Wikimedia > >>>> Movement. IMHO, There is enough space of 10 chapters and Wikimedia > >>> offices > >>>> to co-exist and work together in India.* > >>>> > >>> Did you ever read the Chapter Agreement you signed with WMF? That > >> document > >>> states that WMIN is the ONLY chapter of WMF in India, and that any one > >>> organization must have their "approval" to work in Indian soil (I'm > >> saying > >>> that based in WMPT agreement, WMIN one might be different.) > >>> > >>> > >> I think that the spirit of an agreement is more important than its > wording > >> but > >> I would like to comment both. > >> > >> Regarding the wording, in my opinion what the contract says can be > >> interpreted exactly the other way around. It says that to create another > >> chapter in the same geographical area WMIN will be consulted. [1] It > >> doesn’t say that the approval of WMIN is needed. Furthermore to create > an > >> organization different than chapters not even that consultation is > >> foreseen. > >> > >> As for the spirit I feel that the impression that chapters have private > >> ownership of land is a big mistake that can leads us to a situation > >> contrary to > >> our values. This exclusivity is contrary to the spirit of sharing. We > are > >> not cultivating potatoes where the owner of the land keeps the > potatoes. We > >> give the potatoes away. The more and better people working the land more > >> potatoes can give away. We don’t need land owners, what we need are > >> people working > >> the land. > >> > >> I think these organizations should be happy of having there each other > >> andsee > >> a chance that what one of them can’t do, perhaps will be done by the > other. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Agreement_between_chapters_and_Wikimedia_Foundation#3.%20Geographic_limits > >> _______________________________________________ > >> foundation-l mailing list > >> foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org > >> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > >> > > _______________________________________________ > > foundation-l mailing list > > foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > > > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l