On 28 November 2011 11:03, Andre Engels <andreeng...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 11:58 AM, David Gerard <dger...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > At this point you appear to be stretching to keep a flame war going. > > Stretching? It seemed like a valid chain of reasoning to me. But if > you don't agree, please give your line of reasoning as to how your > statement was a refutation of, or even just a sensible reaction to, my > statement. > -- > Permit me to interrupt your debate here... Perhaps we could go back to the topic of the thread itself rather than the meta-argument of whose reasoning is a sensible reaction to which statement? Erik M's email just above has some very interesting points, both about the WMF's official stance (category-based system is dead; local communities * already* have different approaches; somehow providing tools to reversibly collapse images still happening), as well has his personal opinion (official framework for sharable filter lists takes us too close to censors; existing data does not give us good info on different group's needs; we should providing good advice to readers about personalising their web-experience; building several cheap prototypes is a good step from here). [forgive me if I'm losing some nuance in making this summary] Perhaps we could focus on those practical points - preferably on-wiki - rather than having endless debates about what different people did/didn't mean to say or getting into abstract ideological discussions. -Liam _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l