The poll hit a community of many tens of thousands. So... Tom Morton
On 14 Dec 2011, at 23:10, Mateus Nobre <[email protected]> wrote: > > 87% is more than sufficient. > > En.wikipedia (not that one, I'm native of ptwiki and I voted in it too) it's > like a whole country. > > It's simple impossible to reach a consensus in a place where have 500 people > voting. > Sometimes polls are the only way. I'm not saying the best. It's the only. > > _____________________ > MateusNobre > MetalBrasil on Wikimedia projects > (+55) 85 88393509 > 30440865 > > >> Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 23:00:38 +0000 >> From: [email protected] >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] How SOPA will hurt the free web and Wikipedia >> >> On 14 December 2011 21:57, Kim Bruning <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 05:43:03PM +0000, Thomas Dalton wrote: >> >>>> Presumably >>>> there will be a more formal process to decide whether we actually go >>>> ahead with it - has that started somewhere? If not, has anyone at >>>> least figured out what form that process will take? >> >>> Strictly speaking, the straw poll there is sufficient, unless people bring >>> up true blockers. >> >> >> The poll is at 87% or so (taking a straight count of support vs. >> oppose from the page). Should it be considered sufficient to >> demonstrate overwhelming consensus, the precise course of action has >> not AFAIK been determined. >> >> >> - d. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> foundation-l mailing list >> [email protected] >> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > [email protected] > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
