> How were those languages chosen? I can't see any (clear) criterion being
> used. I've already asked the same question for the "Wikimedia > highlights" (and something else) and I didn't get any answer; given that > you're using the same languages for eveything, it would be nice to > explain where they came from. I suppose the WMF put some thought in it, > so it would help to update the old > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Transcom#Core_set_of_languages > Thank you, > Nemo May be just because they did not have anybody to translate to other languages, as the composition of Transcom suggests? Cheers Yaroslav _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
