Bod Notbod, 10/01/2012 21:57: > If I say that this sounds like a hugely important role the rest of the > office will fold their arms and rightly harumph at me for the implied > negation of their value, so I won't say that. But you can't keep up > with Wikipedia news without being made constantly aware that gaining > new editors is a serious business. I will be fascinated to see what > you make of the ideas for volunteer recruitment we've had so far and > any innovations you can come up with. > > Congratulations and welcome to the other recent new hires as well. > > It would be lovely if each of the new hires could guest post on the > Foundation blog and/or write a page for Signpost once they've settled > in and let us know what their average day is like and some insight > into what they're working on. The staff is now getting to a size where > even close followers of Wikimedia are liable to lose track. Some > effort to keep the community feeling that they know all the staff > would be much appreciated.
Personal perspectives are perhaps not very suitable for the "official blog" (but may be), anyway engineering reports are being published regularly since a while and they're a very good way to know what's going on at least in the technology department, without having to read MiB of text. https://blog.wikimedia.org/c/technology/wmf-engineering-reports/ The other departments are more obscure. :-) Nemo _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
