On 13 January 2012 09:45, Liam Wyatt <[email protected]> wrote: > On 13 January 2012 14:22, Bastien Guerry <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I still expect some of them to react in a way that will make them think > > twice before participating to an upload project. But maybe that's just > > me being pessimistic. > > > > ... > > In fact, quite the contrary, I would not be surprised if many individuals > in GLAM (and other) organisations would privately be very supportive of us > making such a principled stand because we are at liberty to make such > statements in a way publicly funded organisations are not. > > Indeed, there isn't much of a question where most people who work for cultural institutions stand on the issue. Let's not forget that cultural institutions, and especially libraries, are major holders of copyrighted material, and they are put in the position of trying to make it available for research and use while staying within the bounds of the law. Back in November, the American Library Association, the Association of Research Libraries, and the Association of College and Research Libraries, which collectively essentially represent the profession as a whole within the United States, issued a joint statement against SOPA, which you can read here: <http://www.librarycopyrightalliance.org/bm~doc/lca-sopa-8nov11.pdf>. They highlight the fact that libraries could be subject to felony criminal prosecution for unintended infringement for non-commercial purposes.
Dominic _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
