It's worth pointing out the discussion was open from 15 December to 16 January before any close. (Note: 15 December is not when it actually started, it's when it was formally opened as a community discussion - earlier suggestions were also discussed less formally from 10 December on various pages).
Usual discussions last from 5 - 7 days (deletions) to 10 days (adminship) to 14 days (arbitrator elections). This had over 30 days formal discussion. By 13 - 16 January it's reasonable to say that if someone who knew the community's approaches to discussions, or read a wide range of pages, had wished, there was ample time to state a view, and many, many did. Some people only heard at the last minute, or didn't realize it was serious, or missed it, or if some people feel it should have also been advertized in yet more venues. It's hard to do everything right; neither you or I organized it. But even if someone had responded it is incredibly unlikely that anything would have changed. Since then, every feedback the community has had, whether Sue's blog, twitter, otrs, or on-wiki, has confirmed the same overwhelming decision. All that might have been missed around 13 - 16 January was the closers deciding to close it in line with a technical request from developers to allow them 48 hours and hence make a decision by the 16th. There was a month when it was open before then. FT2 _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l