On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 4:19 PM, MZMcBride <[email protected]> wrote:
> https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Policies#Policies lists policies of > the > Wikimedia Foundation. > > Would it make sense to sub-divide these policies into sub-lists? It seems > very strange to place all of these policies next to each other in a single > list. > > I thought about splitting between "Board-approved" and "Otherwise." Then I > considered splitting between "Staff-related", "Contributor-related," > "Meetings-related," etc., but I wasn't so sure how many of these policies > actually (allegedly) apply to contributors (e.g., the whistleblower > policy). > > Any thoughts on this? > > MZMcBride I think it makes sense to better delineate what applies to different groups. I'd help, but considering I actually have probably as little clue as anybody else on the topic, I'm guessing it might be a good idea to ask legal at the WMF to give us the skinny. Steven _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
