Just adding to what Phoebe said (and sorry to top-post): my recommendations are not finalized and have not been submitted formally to the Board. I don't intend to submit them as-is: they will be shaped by the discussion that's been happening thus far, by my own evolving views, and by input from the Board at its meeting. What I am looking for out of the Board meeting is to get nearer to a consensus WRT what direction we want to take.
Thanks, Sue On Jan 30, 2012 8:02 AM, "phoebe ayers" <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 3:18 PM, En Pine <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Phoebe, > > > > On this agenda, could you give more detail about the topic "Paid editing > discussion"? There is a current discussion on EN at the Village Pump > regarding, among other things, PR personnel who edit on Wikipedia in ways > that might violate NPOV and COI policy. It would be good to know if the > Board is taking up this specific subject. Alternatively, if "paid editing > discussion" instead is about editors which will be paid by WMF to edit, I > think the community would want to know that this is will be discussed. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Pine > > Pine: the former, I believe; I haven't heard anything about the latter :) > > Beria: the calendar is posted here -- > http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fundraising_and_Funds_Dissemination > As I understand it we are going to try to get quite indepth into the > recommendations at this meeting, and see if there is consensus to > date, but not take a final vote. > > -- phoebe > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > [email protected] > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
