On 22 February 2012 03:04, Mike Godwin <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 6:35 PM, George Herbert > <[email protected]> wrote:
>> The post-facto probability of 1.0 that the researcher was in fact >> professional, credible, and by all accounts right does not mean that a >> priori he should automatically have been treated that way before the >> situation was clarified. > Should we declare that "Assume Good Faith" is now a dead letter? It's been dead for new editors for a while. New editors are assumed to be a problem, to be processed as quickly as possible with Twinkle or similar in the manner of a processed cheese slice. "Assume good faith" is what the processors then say when the newbie protests at being treated in this manner. - d. - d. _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
