On 22 February 2012 13:29, Thomas Morton <[email protected]> wrote:
> However I am interested in whether you have a specific idea of what you > would change? Can you express a reason for why using the published test is > a poor signal? It produces a rich crop of both false positives and false negatives. I can't think of a better test off the top of my head, but that doesn't mean it's defects are somehow not gross and obvious. No-one who's ever been quoted by the media could ever hear them being called a "reliable source" and keep a straight face. - d. _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
