Just because the list moderators don't publicly come down like a ton of bricks on every conversation that gets lively does not mean that we are absentee. Speaking for myself only, I'll conceed that I have intervened little in recent times, but that has because I have felt little need to do so. In general, I suspect that the level of moderation on this list is too hands-off for some, about right for others, and draconian for a few.
Alex 2012/3/5 Nathan <[email protected]> > I think wikimedia-l would work fine and make sense. We probably don't need > an additional list, a lot of the lists we have now are lightly used. > > I appreciate that Erik unsubscribed from internal-l. I think more people > should do the same thing, on the principle that discussions about the > Wikimedia Foundation and projects should occur in public. Herding debate > into an exclusive clique is antithetical to the ethic of the Wikimedia > movement. > > If the lists have a different tenor such that some people prefer internal-l > over foundation-l, then the solution is more active moderation of this > list. Foundation-l moderation has been absentee for sometime - I don't even > recall the last time a list moderator participated in a discussion, let > alone took a moderator action. > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > [email protected] > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
