Even if it is only one click it is still the same as appending a dislike
button to it (if no all or nothing option). At least it shows, that we
think, that it is something disturbing. At this point it has nothing to
do with curating content, it's a mere tool to represent POV.
nya~
Am 12.03.2012 14:55, schrieb Gerard Meijssen:
Hoi,
When you consider that the current proposal is for a system where it takes
one click to see something anyway, I do think the notion that something is
not knowable is over the top.
Thanks,
Gerard
On 12 March 2012 14:07, David Gerard<[email protected]> wrote:
On 12 March 2012 12:28, Richard Symonds
<[email protected]> wrote:
deepest parts of the US bible belt, and areas such as Pakistan and India,
which have sizeable English-speaking populations and a very strong
religious
vein. With such a diverse worldwide readership on one language, it is
only
natural that people from the bible belt /do/ have a say in whether or not
having an image filter is appropriate. We owe it to these people to make
sure that Wikipedia is not blocked in their countries.
You're describing places in terms of fundamentally rejecting the
Enlightenment. General encyclopedias, starting from l'Encyclopedie,
are an Enlightenment project. Ultimately, we can't cripple Wikipedia
for the world because some parts of it are not happy with the idea of
people being allowed to know stuff in general.
- d.
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
[email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
[email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
[email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
